women’s history

Sidesaddle: Protect Thy Hymen!

sidesaddle

by Matilda Branson

I ride horses. I think I was first on a horse at the age of 8 or 9 months old. Horse riding comes as naturally to me as does breathing. Wherever I live, or travel in the world, my eye is automatically on the look-out for anything horse-related, be it a likely stable or potential horse jump (the front fences of houses are usually particularly promising), even if I don’t have a horse with me. When I see a golf course, I think how wonderful it would be to gallop across the pristine turf. Desperate for horse contact whilst living in Nepal, I rescued a small pony from a brick kiln factory. A few years ago, I rode 1000 km across Mongolia on horseback, because how could I not? A horse-mad feminist, through and through.

When I ride, I ride astride. Most people do. If you’ve ever ridden, you were probably riding astride too, one leg either side of the horse. Yet this is a pretty recent thing for women to do. If you look at mediaeval paintings, and even photos up until the early 20th century of women riding, you’ll often see them sidesaddle, seated with two legs on one side of the horse.

Have you ever used the phrase “bohemian” to describe something a bit alternative or unconventional? The earliest form of the sidesaddle is credited towards one Princess Anne of Bohemia who travelled across Europe on a primitive form of the sidesaddle to wed King Richard II, thus setting a bit of a trend particularly for those of noble birth, that to ride astride was unladylike and improper. Although a few feisty ladies through the ages bucked (ha ha) the trend – Catherine the Great, Joan of Arc, Marie Antoinette, just to name a few – the sidesaddle became the principal mode of riding for women for a good half a century or so.

But why the sidesaddle?  Why not a normal one? Was it because of the dresses they wore, or their perceived weakness as women in comparison to men and their inability to control their mighty steeds? Maybe a little. But the main motivation I think came with the social norm: A woman to straddle a horse – oh the thought of it! How unbecoming of a lady!

So what was underpinning such ideas? For all those anthropologists out there, it all boils down to ideas around a woman’s purity and chastity, and male control and regulation of female sexuality (perhaps the thinking behind this is if it’s left uncontrolled, women might just rampage across the Earth: wild, irrational and dangerous, hormones unbridled, ha ha).  Once the mediaeval times dug in, so did feudalism and all the patriarchal norms that go with it, including the utmost need for a girl (especially an aristocratic one like our Princess Anne of Bohemia) to remain chaste and a virgin until her wedding night. And how to prove she’s a virgin? Why, the old blood-on-the-sheets and broken hymen trick! Convinces the rellies every time. Riding astride? A big no-no if daddy, mummy and hubby-to-be wanted to keep the hymen intact.

It was only really at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th, with the suffragette movement, the first World War and the general modernisation of things that the sidesaddle began to go out of vogue. Although today it continues to be used, and is a respected part of equestrianism in itself due to the skill required in riding sidesaddle, most women today ride astride.  Which I, for one, am very glad of, as otherwise I would fall off a lot. The point of this post is: don’t forget the seemingly obscure ways in which women have gained greater freedoms as part of the greater feminist movement. There are so many of them out there, which is great, and I would neigh for joy if I could.


Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism Leave a comment

Vintage Pregnancy Advice from the Canadian Government

canmotherby Jarrah Hodge

Thrift shopping with my mom and boyfriend in North Vancouver the other day I came across a real gem: a 1947 printing of the Canadian government’s handbook The Canadian Mother and Child, by Ernest Couture, M.D., Director of the Division of Child and Maternal Health.

A little context: this is the 7th printing of the 1st edition of the handbook, and it was a really popular guide that ended up being published and distributed every year for over 30 years. An article from Canadian Encyclopedia describes how important this book and other similar guides were to women in the 1940s:

In the 1940s, child-rearing was done, literally, by the book. Janet Berton vividly remembers the one she used -Canadian Mother and Child, a brochure from the federal health department that her doctor gave her when her first child, Penny, was born in 1948. “It had wonderful pictures of old, old, old-fashioned babies and nurses in black and white,” says Berton, who with her husband, author Pierre Berton, raised a family of eight children. “But it was pretty authoritarian. You had to do exactly what it said.” Berton says she tried to follow the rules for feeding an infant on a strict timetable, every four hours, and soon wound up “in a panic” because the baby did not seem to be getting enough milk.

I had an interesting time reading the guide and learning what women like my grandmother would have been advised to do when they were pregnant in that era, and thought I’d share some of the more interesting and maybe surprising lessons with you.

"While Awaiting a Baby", photo from Library & Archives Canada

“While Awaiting a Baby”, photo from Library & Archives Canada

On the Joy of Motherhood

“The birth of a baby is the most glorious achievement in the life of a woman, for, in becoming a mother, she completely fulfils the special purpose of her life as a woman.” (p. 3)

“There is nothing more fascinating for a mother than to read about the care of a baby.” (p. 84)

“The very presence of your baby, and your feeling of love for it, should prove more eloquent than any words to persuade you to breast-feed your infant, if you are able to do so.” (p. 108)

“When you bend affectionately over your growing infant, does not the contented joy of your heart tell you powerfully that you are gazing on the most precious of all your possessions? As the infant lies, charming but helpless, and dependent on you for everything, you feel that it was fully worth those special pains on your part to give it proper nourishment, to provide the benefit of fresh air and sunshine, the comfort of cleanliness and appropriate clothes, to guard it against digestive troubles, infections and contagious diseases and accidents, and also to direct with love the first manifestations of a budding character.” (p. 203)

On Lady-Parts

“Special local examination. On no account should you let false modesty influence you in the matter of this local examination. Unfortunately this is often the case, particularly with mothers expecting their first baby. You would not forgive yourself if, through neglect of this very important examination, some mishap occurred.” (p. 7)

“For local hygiene use a mild soap, or a mild antiseptic solution recommended by your doctor or a solution of baking soda or boracic acid (1 dessert spoonful to a quart of warm water). Make sure to dry the parts thoroughly.” (p. 40)

“In a married woman, the missing of a period is usually due to pregnancy.” (p. 11)

On Leisure Time

“There is, of course, no harm in playing bridge. Indeed it is a wholesome way of relaxing, if not abused, but it is fatiguing if indulged in too frequently or for lengthy sessions.” (p. 21) Read more

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Can-Con, Feminism 2 Comments

Gender Focus Reads: Women Make Noise: Girl Bands from Motown to the Modern

by Josey Ross

Writing about Women Make Noise: Girl Bands from Motown to the Modern, edited by Julia Downes,  is tricky. On the one hand, it’s a very good feminist history—inspiring, frustrating and exhaustive. On the other, it occasionally veers into territory too academic for pleasure reading and its commitment to shining the light on obscure girl bands can feel like a bit of a slog.

Starting with all-woman bands playing American Old-Time and Country music in the 1920s-1940s, going through girl bands of the ‘50s and ‘60s up through punk, post-punk, queercore, riot grrl and finishing up with Pussy Riot the authors paint a picture of the challenge girl groups face(d) in a very male-dominated industry, as well as the ways that women subverted gendered expectations and norms.

From the Ronettes of the ’60s navigating race and gender to ‘70s punk bad Ova opening a community music studio in order to “make music and music-making an accessible, demystified activity available to women as an empowering tool for social change” (p.120) to the Rock Girl Camps of the 21st century Women Make Noise provides a forgotten history of the intersections of music and activism.

Tales of race riots, intimidation and abuse by male music fans and management, and inspiring moments of in-your-face activism provide fascinating background to some of your favourite bands (and many you’ve never heard of). The greatest strength of Women Make Noise is that many of the contributors were themselves part of the bands they’re chronicling. These women offer up inspiring, funny and enraging stories of being radical activists and prolific musicians in a world that worked constantly to push them down.

This is not a book for a casual music fan, it’s a book for lovers of music who want a deeper, richer history; for those who want to explore bands and feminism and the tiny and huge revolutions that women created by picking up guitars, learning how to care for and fix their own equipment, and being unapologetic in their demands to be taken seriously as musicians.

 

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism, Pop Culture 1 Comment

Feminism F.A.Q.s: What Have Women Been Told They Can’t Do?

Feminism FAQs Title Screen

by Jarrah Hodge

Doing my video on the myth of feminist bra burning inspired me to take on another topic or two around women’s history. This video looks at just a few of the things women have been told they can’t do, through actual legal prohibitions (e.g. voting) or social norms (riding bicycles). It also lists a few of the things women are still told they “can’t do” today.

It was a bit tricky writing the film deciding whether to include women in other countries, since the time was limited and I never really planned to specify except for specifically mentioning driving prohibitions in Saudi Arabia. In the end most of the content is drawn from the history of Western women in order to combat the argument that women in the West no longer experience discrimination, but I do include some worldwide examples in the second list in the video.

Read the transcript after the jump with links to sources. If a source isn’t linked to it means it’s considered to be common knowledge (first list) or I found it by Googling “women can’t” or “women aren’t allowed to” and then seeing what came up (second list, tended to turn up results like this “joke” list).

I’ll also note a few things on the first list of historical “can’ts” also apply to the present-day, at least outside of North America. Inclusion on the first list isn’t meant to imply these are issues that no longer exist anywhere (for example, women still clearly experience issues trying to breastfeed in public, even in places where it’s totally legal).

Read more

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism 7 Comments

Feminism F.A.Q.s: Did Feminists Burn Bras?

Feminism FAQs Title Screenby Jarrah Hodge

I’m pretty happy to have got my Feminism F.A.Q.s mojo back with this new edition: Did Feminists Burn Bras?

You may notice I have a bit of a new look for the videos and I’ve improved the sound quality significantly. I have two more new ones I’m in the process of editing and I re-filmed 3 of the older ones using the better mic and lighting, so I’ve removed those from my YouTube and the Feminism F.A.Q.s page on this website until that’s done.

As usual, please comment below if you have any topics you’d like me to cover in future videos , and these videos are designed as a resource for other feminists and bloggers to help you deal with these questions in an accessible, and succinct format. So feel free to share!

Special thanks to Anita at Feminist Frequency for sharing her experience and helping me resolve some of my tech issues.

(photo in the video is from Duke University Special Collections, via Media Myth Alert) Full transcript after the jump.

Read more

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism, Pop Culture 5 Comments

Gender Focus Reads: The City of Ladies

by Jarrah Hodge

This is a response to the February book selection for Feminist Classics Book Club: Christine de Pizan’s The City of Ladies (1405). Here’s some of the background from their site:

Christine de Pizan (1363-c.1430) was quite a well-known poet in her day. She was born in Venice, but her father accepted a position at the French court soon after[...]In her book, Christine builds an entire metaphorical city out of noble, heroic, or righteous women.  She creates three allegorical women, Reason, Justice, and Rectitude, who engage in a dialogue with her about why women are slandered and how to show that women do not deserve this reputation.

There are two aspects of Christine’s treatise that I want to examine: the basis for her defense of women, and the attacks she identifies against them. The former – her defense – was no doubt revolutionary at the time. Rosalind Brown-Grant, who wrote the introduction to the edition I read, asks us to remember that Christine was responding to attacks that were based in Aristotelian philosophy and Christian scripture. Therefore, she examines the contradictions in these sources and uses them to help her respond. Her extensive use of references to mythology wouldn’t pass peer-review nowadays, but what she was doing was using the very weapons of women’s attackers against them. According to Brown-Grant:

“At the heart of Christine’s defense of women…was her profound conviction that it is a human – and not a specifically female – trait to be prone to sin. However, she also believed that if men and women are alike as sinners, they are equally capable of adopting rational forms of behaviour and of making informed choices.”

However, few of the arguments she makes in regards to women’s virtue or natural roles would be palatable to feminists today. Read more

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism 1 Comment

A Part of Our Heritage?

Part of Our Heritage Screen Capby Jarrah Hodge

Most Canadian kids of the 80s and early 90s will remember the “Part of Our Heritage” ads produced by Charles Bronfman’s CRB Foundation that seemed to run almost non-stop. As much as we enjoy mocking them, we learned from them. We learned why the Bluenose is on the dime (it beat the US in a race), that Winnie the Pooh was named after Winnipeg, and that a Canadian invented basketball by suggesting cutting a hole in the bottom of a basket to save going up the ladder to fetch the ball.

I can’t remember exactly what exactly triggered it but the other day I was prompted to re-watch the ads on YouTube. I noticed a lot of things I hadn’t thought about when I was 7 or 8 and thought I’d take a post or two to do a little bit of retrospective analysis. I realized Heritage Minutes didn’t just teach us Canadian history factoids: they presented certain views of race and gender that occasionally challenged but more often reinforced popular stereotypes.

Heritage Minutes on Women

I’ll start with the Heritage Minutes that looked at white women’s history, because they’re actually fairly good. My favourite of all of them is the story about how women attending medical school faced harassment: Read more

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Can-Con, Pop Culture 4 Comments