Harper’s Gendered Attack on Justin Trudeau

Recent print attack ad against Justin Trudeau by the Conservatives.

Recent print attack ad against Justin Trudeau by the Conservatives.

by Matt Moir. Matt is a writer based in Toronto.

Michelle Rempel rolled her eyes and paused, choosing her words carefully.

Standing in the lobby outside the House of Commons, the Conservative MP for Calgary Centre had just been informed that she had been voted Sexiest Female MP in an Ottawa newspaper’s annual poll.

“I get the opportunity to speak to a lot of women’s groups about encouraging women to run for office, and about women’s leadership issues and the number one thing I always say is women should be judged and evaluated by their merit.”

If only her boss would heed her message.

Her Conservative Party’s negative ad campaign against Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau may, as some have claimed, be successfully rallying the Tory base, and thus helping the party fill its coffers. But it’s also alienating a section of the electorate vital to Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s chances of winning another majority government: female voters.

Trudeau’s poll numbers are overwhelmingly positive among women. A recent Harris/Decima poll found that 61% of Canadian women view Trudeau favorably, whereas Harper is viewed favorably by only 37% of women.

Some commentators attribute this support for Trudeau to the fact that women in Canada traditionally are more supportive of left-leaning politicians than conservative ones.

Others say that women are drawn to the Liberal leader’s charisma and good looks- he was, after all, voted sexiest MP in The Hill Times’ annual survey.

What shouldn’t be discounted, though – and what probably should be explored further – is that Canadian women might be able to identify with the young MP, and the nature of the personal attack ads he’s had to endure.

Immediately after Trudeau won his party’s leadership race, the Tories unleashed a torrent of ads attacking the newly minted Liberal leader. This is nothing new, of course. The Conservatives are well versed in the art of the political takedown; just ask Stéphane Dion and Michael Ignatieff. But what makes the ‘Justin’ ads different is the unseemly gender baiting aspect to them. Read more

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Can-Con, Feminism, Politics Leave a comment

Sidesaddle: Protect Thy Hymen!

sidesaddle

by Matilda Branson

I ride horses. I think I was first on a horse at the age of 8 or 9 months old. Horse riding comes as naturally to me as does breathing. Wherever I live, or travel in the world, my eye is automatically on the look-out for anything horse-related, be it a likely stable or potential horse jump (the front fences of houses are usually particularly promising), even if I don’t have a horse with me. When I see a golf course, I think how wonderful it would be to gallop across the pristine turf. Desperate for horse contact whilst living in Nepal, I rescued a small pony from a brick kiln factory. A few years ago, I rode 1000 km across Mongolia on horseback, because how could I not? A horse-mad feminist, through and through.

When I ride, I ride astride. Most people do. If you’ve ever ridden, you were probably riding astride too, one leg either side of the horse. Yet this is a pretty recent thing for women to do. If you look at mediaeval paintings, and even photos up until the early 20th century of women riding, you’ll often see them sidesaddle, seated with two legs on one side of the horse.

Have you ever used the phrase “bohemian” to describe something a bit alternative or unconventional? The earliest form of the sidesaddle is credited towards one Princess Anne of Bohemia who travelled across Europe on a primitive form of the sidesaddle to wed King Richard II, thus setting a bit of a trend particularly for those of noble birth, that to ride astride was unladylike and improper. Although a few feisty ladies through the ages bucked (ha ha) the trend – Catherine the Great, Joan of Arc, Marie Antoinette, just to name a few – the sidesaddle became the principal mode of riding for women for a good half a century or so.

But why the sidesaddle?  Why not a normal one? Was it because of the dresses they wore, or their perceived weakness as women in comparison to men and their inability to control their mighty steeds? Maybe a little. But the main motivation I think came with the social norm: A woman to straddle a horse – oh the thought of it! How unbecoming of a lady!

So what was underpinning such ideas? For all those anthropologists out there, it all boils down to ideas around a woman’s purity and chastity, and male control and regulation of female sexuality (perhaps the thinking behind this is if it’s left uncontrolled, women might just rampage across the Earth: wild, irrational and dangerous, hormones unbridled, ha ha).  Once the mediaeval times dug in, so did feudalism and all the patriarchal norms that go with it, including the utmost need for a girl (especially an aristocratic one like our Princess Anne of Bohemia) to remain chaste and a virgin until her wedding night. And how to prove she’s a virgin? Why, the old blood-on-the-sheets and broken hymen trick! Convinces the rellies every time. Riding astride? A big no-no if daddy, mummy and hubby-to-be wanted to keep the hymen intact.

It was only really at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th, with the suffragette movement, the first World War and the general modernisation of things that the sidesaddle began to go out of vogue. Although today it continues to be used, and is a respected part of equestrianism in itself due to the skill required in riding sidesaddle, most women today ride astride.  Which I, for one, am very glad of, as otherwise I would fall off a lot. The point of this post is: don’t forget the seemingly obscure ways in which women have gained greater freedoms as part of the greater feminist movement. There are so many of them out there, which is great, and I would neigh for joy if I could.


Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism Leave a comment

FFFF: “Women’s Fiction”

FFFFRon Charles, book critic for the Washington Post, has made this awesome satire about the VIDA stats showing the relative lack of attention novels by women receive in terms of major media outlet book reviews.

(h/t Women and Hollywood)

 

 

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in FFFF Leave a comment

Why the Delay Approving RU486 in Canada?

ru486by Jarrah Hodge

Australia is well on its way to making publicly available mifepristone and misoprostol, two drugs that make up RU486, used for abortion up to 49 days after becoming pregnant. If you’ve never heard of it it might sound a little scary, and that’s the angle anti-choice activists and legislators love to promote, but the truth is RU486 has been around for more than 20 years and has been demonstrated to be very safe. It is approved for use in 38 countries and is the preferred method for medical abortion in many, including France.

According to the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, RU486 has been associated with proportionately fewer deaths than Tylenol or Viagra. It’s also less risky than going through a full-term pregnancy.

Gail Rhyno at ROAR notes that RU486 is on the World Health Organization’s Model List of Essential Medicines, which catalogues 312 drugs considered international benchmarks in meeting “priority care needs”.

If a woman needs to terminate a pregnancy, it doesn’t make sense to prevent her from choosing this option. It allows a woman to make the decision with her family doctor and not have to face in many cases travelling long distances to a clinic where they may be subject to anti-choice harassment. Even more importantly, it has lower complication rates and is significantly cheaper than other forms of medical abortion. In Australia, public pharmaceutical coverage is likely to make RU486 available to all women for $36, and $12 for women who receive benefits.

So why the delay in Canada? In a country where many women still face barriers to accessing surgical abortion, it would certainly fill a need. It’s important to note there is an approved method of medical abortion in some places in Canada, but it’s not as efficient or effective. Health Canada’s procedures for approving drugs are stringent (as they should be), but the issue is not that the drug has gone through the process and failed; it has never been submitted to the final step for approval. Some RU486 advocates believe that what’s missing to get it through the process is political will and a greater commitment from Health Canada.  Fern Hill at Dammit Janet points out that Health Canada’s handling of the recent Apotex birth control pill recall raised questions about the agency’s level of understanding of women’s reproductive health needs.

The best thing to do right now is for people who care about reproductive health to educate themselves on RU486 and to raise the issue with your family doctor or OB/GYN. It’s time for Canada to catch up with the rest of the world on making private abortion safer and more effective.

(photo of pills [not RU486]  via Wikimedia Commons)

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Can-Con, Feminism, Politics Leave a comment

YWCA Advocates for Homes for Women

HFW-Header

by Laura Riina. Laura is a YWCA Toronto Volunteer with the Y Act Up Campaign.

While we have known for years that poverty disproportionally affects women, what remains hidden is the rapid increase in Canadian women’s homelessness- as well as the domestic violence, growing economic inequality and sexual abuse that creates many of the conditions for homelessness.

What is important to remember is that women’s homelessness seems to affect some categories for women more than others. It impacts many vulnerable groups, including single mothers, Indigenous women, women with disabilities, women with mental health & addiction issues, racialized women, members of the LGBTQ population, and women with precarious immigration status. These groups are more likely to be at risk in the future as women are now Canada’s fastest growing homeless population. Even more concerning is that the majority of women’s homelessness is “hidden”.

Because of the great safety risk women face living on the streets, women are far more likely to resort to “hidden homelessness”. This can include couch-surfing with friends, staying with exploitative and abusive relatives, spending time in a shelter, or continuing to stay with an abusive partner. That women in these situations are homeless is often not recognized, and, as a result, women are greatly under-counted.

As a result, women are greatly under-counted in the homeless population and services are underfunded.

The phenomenon of increased women’s homelessness and economic inequality is not likely to change without rapid, comprehensive action from every level of government. This is an issue that impacts Canadian women, or status: Every year, 75,000-100,000 women and children leave their homes for the temporary safety of a shelter for abused women. 42% of homeless girls in Vancouver were First Nation, Métis or Inuit- a rate 10 times their representation in the general population. 55% of homeless women in Toronto have a mental health diagnosis, at double the rate of homeless men.

Our system for dealing with the homelessness of women and girls homelessness in Canada needs to change.

To combat this issue, YWCA Canada has created Homes for Women, a national campaign to prevent, reduce, and ultimately end the homelessness of women and girls in Canada.  YWCA Canada believes individuals and governments, community groups and corporations, trade unions and local leaders can all take meaningful action that prevents and reduces women’s homelessness. Some of the important policies the Homes for Women advocates include:

 

If you believe women have the right to a safe, secure home, please sign YWCA Canada’s national pledge to end women’s homelessness Sign the Pledge and consider donating to this important cause.

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Can-Con, Feminism Leave a comment

The Round-Up: May 7, 2013

  • roundup3Farrah Khan at Shameless looks at the myths being challenged in the case of N.S., a woman who has spent years fighting for her right to testify while wearing a niqab against relatives she says molested her.
  • Angus Johnston of Student Activism responds to Niall Ferguson, who this past week caught flak for saying Keynes’ economic theories were short-sighted because he was gay.
  • A straight, 18-year-old girl from Texas is standing up against her principal’s attempt to stop her from supporting LGBT rights at school (Queerty).
  • Jezebel reports on a creepy new app for guys who want to play at being “pickup artists”.
  • Tennis legend Billie Jean King talks at NY Mag about Jason Collins and the lesbian athletes who came out or were outed before him.
  • A Saskatoon bridal shop owner asked a trans woman to leave because “we don’t allow men to wear dresses here” (Transgriot).
  • And Towleroad reports on the firing of a Toronto RE/MAX real estate agent for putting out a flyer advocating for “traditional families”.
  • Lauren Chief Elk does a great job eloquently expressing the concerns of many Indigenous women related to Eve Ensler’s V-Day One Billion Rising campaign. OBR Canadian Coordinator Tanisha Taitt responded and you can read that here (though it raises its own concerns) and later Eve Ensler also issued an apology. The discussion is far from over but I think these are important concerns to be familiar with for anyone involved in these events next year.
Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Round-Ups Leave a comment

See a Woman Reading? Leave Her Alone.

484px-Reading_woman_2by Jessica Critcher

A few months ago, I went to meet with a colleague at his apartment. Since I wasn’t familiar with the neighborhood and I’m paranoid about being late, I budgeted extra time to find the address. It turned out to be easy to find, so I ended up with an hour to myself. Thankfully, a person who likes to read is never bored. I pulled out a book (This book, actually) and prepared to indulge in an hour of reading in a quiet, sunny public park. I barely got through one page before a man started talking to me.

He told me I was cute and asked me if I had a boyfriend. And even after I told him I was married, he just kept talking at me. For the record, I understand that this man was just trying to be friendly, and he probably didn’t mean to annoy me or make me feel weird. But since I felt weird and annoyed, his intentions were irrelevant.

Eventually I pulled out my phone, told him I was running late, and headed on my way. By then I was too upset to properly concentrate on my book. But it wasn’t even about the book in the first place. It was about my personal space, which he ignored. This kind of thing happens all the time.

Whenever I express my frustration about this, someone invariably tells me, “But he was just trying to be friendly/strike up a conversation/learn more about the subject.” Stop. What you are telling me is that the fact that a man wants to talk to is more important (and should therefore be given more consideration) than the fact that I want to be left alone. I should dig deeper and find the good intentions behind why this man interrupted me. I should give this man the benefit of a doubt and take the fact that he bothered me as a compliment. The desires of a stranger are more important than mine.

I had a friend counter my point, saying that she personally likes it when people stop to chat her up while she’s reading. If you like that, good for you! Opportunities for that to happen are plentiful. I happen to detest it and would like it to stop. People usually follow this up by asking how potential partners are supposed to meet each other, as if it’s supposed to check-mate my argument. But that’s not my problem. If you really want to know, check out this piece called “Schrödinger’s Rapist,” which offers some advice on how to approach women without being creepy:

To begin with, you must accept that I set my own risk tolerance. When you approach me, I will begin to evaluate the possibility you will do me harm. That possibility is never 0%. For some women, particularly women who have been victims of violent assaults, any level of risk is unacceptable. Those women do not want to be approached, no matter how nice you are or how much you’d like to date them. Okay? That’s their right. Don’t get pissy about it. Women are under no obligation to hear the sales pitch before deciding they are not in the market to buy.

I like that some people find reading to be an attractive trait. But I don’t read for anyone’s enjoyment but my own. Men of the world, if you see a woman reading a book, eyes darting from line to line, wrapped up in her own universe, leave her alone. She is probably having a moment, and she deserves to have it. Read more

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism 15 Comments