The Round-Up: June 8, 2010

Extra, Extra! Read all about it! Here’s your round up of things we missed.

  • The Glee season finale is tonight. Now I have a bit of a thing where I try to avoid pop-culture that everyone else seems to like, so the more popular Glee gets the more tempted I am to stop watching it. But gosh darn it, those peppy musical numbers, the message that people should sing out and be themselves, and the stellar weekly performances by Jane Lynch and Matthew Morrison – not to mention the reams of Broadway guest-stars like Idina Menzel and Kristen Chenoweth – keep me coming back for more. Now Glee is certainly not perfect. Bitch Magazine has done a great job of in-depth analyzing this season’s episodes with reference to how they fail to fully challenge gender stereotypes, over-simply feminism, and tokenize people with disabilities. These are important things to watch out for, but you know the show’s doing something correctly when it’s succeeded in pissing off the religious right. Michael Jones at Change.org reports that Conservative blogger Brent Bozell is up in arms because he thinks Glee makes homosexuality normal and unfairly stereotypes homophobes by portraying them as bullies. It takes a big man to stand up for the rights of homophobes. Score 1 for Glee!

 

 

  • The old “are men better at science” debate has been thrust back into the spotlight in both the US and Canada. It started when the Canadian government gave 19 out of 19 esearch chair positions to men. Women professors decried the lack of progress for women in science and the government’s lack of procedure to ensure a more equal nomination pool. Then UBC Professor Andrew Irvine charged that actually it’s men who are discriminated against due to affirmative action at universities, though he cited no concrete examples or proof of this. Now the Globe and Mail’s Gary Mason isn’t exactly what you’d call a feminist, but I’ll give him some props for taking on Dr. Irvine on this issue.

 

  • In the States the same discussion has come to the fore because the House of Representatives recently passed legislation which would require the White House science adviser to oversee gender equity workshops. At this link, Jezebel takes on the New York Times’ John Tierney for arguing that this will impede the ability for researchers to argue that women are simply not as good at science than men. I’m currently reading Anne Fausto-Sterling’s Myths of Gender, which is slightly dated but still very relevant, so this is an issue we’ll be keeping our eye on.

 

  • And to finish things off, here’s a random nerdy cartoon from Cyanide & Happiness for those of you who remember kids’ shows of the 90s:

-Jarrah

Bookmark and Share

 

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Round-Ups Leave a comment

FFFF: 22 Minutes on John Baird

Because it’s related to E. Cain’s post from this morning, I thought I’d share this clip from This Hour Has 22 Minutes about John Baird’s temper for your Friday Feminist Funny Film.

-Jarrah

 

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Can-Con, FFFF, Politics Leave a comment

Baird is Parliamentarian of the Year?: Oh Hell No!

Today I want to write about the antiquated masculine culture which permeates Canadian Politics. If you’ve ever watched Question Period, then you know what I’m talking about.  Politics is one of the few professions in this country where is considered acceptable (even encouraged) to point fingers, scream, yell, bang on desks and berate your colleagues.

One politician who has built a reputation for himself based on this abhorrent behaviour is the Conservative Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, John Baird. The Globe and Mail writes “[Baird has] gained a reputation as an attack dog, screaming responses to opposition questions, insulting and snarling at any who have the audacity to challenge him.”

Minister John Baird

Charming right? Well, today Baird was named Parliamentarian of the Year in Macleans magazine. This honour is bestowed by the Canadian Members of Parliament. They are asked to vote in several categories (their votes are converted into a points system to ensure that larger parties don’t have an advantage). This year, 202 MPs voted (nearly 70%).

The accompanying Maclean’s article gushes about Baird, including: his leadership marshalling the Accountability Act and overseeing billions of dollars in federal stimulus money; his role as Harper’s #2; and his behind-the-scenes ability to schmooze with the best of them.

While this may all be true, when I heard that Baird was the recipient of this honour, my first reaction was: Oh Hell No!

John Baird is one of the most disrespectful politicians in the Canadian government. This is his public persona. This is what he is known for. In a previous blog article on gendered media coverage of politicians, I wrote about Baird’s ‘emotional outburst’ last summer which resulted in him telling the city of Toronto to ‘f- off.’  Sadly, this is not unusual behaviour for Baird. In fact, on the very same day he was named Parliamentarian of the Year, he showed up uninvited to a committee hearing. He then berated the Chair, Liberal MP Yasmin Ratansi, implying she was unintelligent and referring to her by her first name, and lashed out at another committee member Liberal MP Siobhan Coady.

To hammer home my point – the confrontational, adversarial nature of Canadian politics is identified as one of the main reasons why women don’t run for political office. This does not mean that women are weak. It means that many women don’t want to go to work every day and have to deal with disrespectful men. It makes for a hostile working environment, it’s demoralizing and downright counter-productive.

Over the years, countless politicians – of both genders and of all political stripes – have called for a change in this ‘blood sport’ mentality present in Canadian Politics. For this reason, I have to say that I was shocked John Baird was named Parliamentarian of the Year! He represents the epitome of what needs to change in Canadian politics. He should not be rewarded; a better course of action would be to reprimand him for his unacceptable behaviour and recommend anger management.

-E. Cain


 

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Can-Con, Feminism, Politics 2 Comments

Call to Action: Equal Protection for Trans People

MP Bill Siksay’s Private Member’s Bill C-389, which would add gender identity and gender expression as prohibited grounds of discrimination to the Canadian Human Rights Act, is coming up for debate and another vote next week. There will be one hour of debate on Tuesday, June 8, and a vote on Second Reading on June 9. If passed, the bill will be sent to committee for consideration.

Here’s an excerpt from Bill Siksay’s call for action:

“Bill C-389 would update the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) to include gender identity and gender expression as prohibited grounds of discrimination, and update the Criminal Code of Canada to include gender identity and gender expression in the hate crime and sentencing provisions.

Transsexual and transgender people are often victims of discrimination, harassment, and violence because of their gender identity and gender expression. They often experience injustices such as denial of employment, housing, access to trans-sensitive health care, and face difficulties obtaining identification documents. Because there are so many barriers for transsexual and transgender Canadians, explicit rights and protections must be added to the CHRA and the Criminal Code.”

So here’s what you can do to help make sure this bill passes:

Thanks for your help!

-Jarrah

Bookmark and Share

 

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Can-Con, Feminism, LGBT, Politics Leave a comment

Write for Gender Focus!

Our submission guidelines are now posted on the site! I’d encourage you to check them out if you’re interested in submitting an article, opinion piece, or personal reflection that you feel falls within Gender Focus’ subject area. Submissions from people of all genders are welcome. Please feel free to comment on this post or email me at jarrahhodge@gmail.com if you have any questions.

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism Leave a comment

Can't Help Hatin' That Song

Last night I took my dad to see The Manhattan Transfer play at the Centre for Performing Arts in Vancouver. It was awesome and they brought the house down. For the record, there was co-ordinated snapping but no flashy 80′s pants – their style as well as their music has adapted well to changing times.

At least most of it.

The one point I felt kind of uncomfortable was during Tim Hauser’s solo rendition of the jazz standard “She’s Funny that Way.” The song was first released in 1929 and has been re-recorded several times since, notably by Frank Sinatra. Here are the lyrics that gave me pause:

Though she’d love to work and slave for me every day
She’d be so much better off if I went away…

When I hurt her feelings once in a while
Her only answer is one little smile
I got a woman, crazy for me
She’s funny that way

I’m going to choose to interpret that as funny-bizarre more than funny-ha-ha.

K.J. McElrath at Jazzstandards.com guesses the song was partially inspired by the similarly-themed “Can’t Help Lovin’ Dat Man” by Jerome Kern from Show Boat. And there are a bunch of other jazz standards, especially from that era, that present a similar story: a lazy and selfish man in a relationship with (read: in possession of) an endlessly patient, self-sacrificing woman. (In the case of “Can’t Help Lovin’ Dat Man”, the song has an additional undercurrent of racism that has led to several rewordings over the years.)

Ava Gardner in the movie of Show Boat

Some other examples: “I Enjoy Being a Girl”, “Black Coffee”, “I Got a Woman”, ”My Man”, and “Girls Were Made to Take Care of Boys”.

These songs are heteronormative and are most obviously sexist towards women, implying women should subordinate their own needs to their husbands’. But they don’t exactly present a flattering view of masculinity, either. In these songs, men are thoughtless louts.

Just as it sucks for women to get the message that they have to put up with crap in a relationship, I’d imagine it would suck for some guys to receive the societal message that they’re not expected to be competent or emotionally intelligent.

Even in the present day there are similar narrative in sitcoms like My Name is Earl, Family Guy, and King of Queens, where guys are portrayed as incompetent, lazy bunglers compared to their smart, attractive wives.

The messages are still around, so when I heard Tim Hauser sing “She’s Funny that Way” I had no idea it was written in the 1920s. Granted, I was one of the few people in the audience under fifty, so that could be generational.

So here’s what I’m wondering: are these songs merely a product of their times and thus nothing to worry about? Or is there something damaging about recording and performing these types of songs outside of historical context? In a contemporary setting are these songs value-neutral or do they sentimentalize sexism and unequal gender relations?

-Jarrah


Bookmark and Share

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism, Pop Culture Leave a comment

FFFF: Twilight

We’ve got two Friday feminist funny films today, both of which deal with Twilight. This is in honour of the release of the 3rd film, which my roommates remind me is coming out at the end of June.

To be right up front, I’m not a fan. I saw the first movie because my sister and I were on Hornby Island, it was raining, and let’s face it: there wasn’t much else to do. It wasn’t the worst thing I’ve ever seen, but I’m gonna side with the makers of the following two films.

Feminist Frequency has a cute take on the right and wrong reasons for guys to dislike Twilight:

And in case you missed it, here’s a mash-up of Buffy vs. Edward:

And this has absolutely nothing to do with the FFFF theme, but I’m ridiculously over-excited about going to see The Manhattan Transfer tomorrow with my Dad – their first time in Vancouver in many many years. So for those many, many of you who aren’t 24-year-olds who like super cheezy vocal jazz, here is an example of their trademark 80s awesomeness. If they don’t do coordinated finger-snapping on Saturday, I will be highly disappointed.

-Jarrah

 

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in FFFF, Pop Culture Leave a comment