Baby Scan Jesus and Other Weird Anti-Choice Ads

I’ve seen a lot of  anti-choice ads, and most of them have some level of weird-creepiness. There are the racist and sexist Genocide Awareness Project campus displays (warning: link contains graphic images) which compare aborted fetuses to Holocaust victims. There are the deceptive Crisis Pregnancy Centre ads listed under abortion services in many phone and web directories. There’s the highly illogical Superbowl ad by CatholicVote.org that got rejected, which was to feature an unborn baby Obama with the tagline: “Life: Imagine the Potential.”

But just in the last two days I’ve come across some of the weirdest ones I’ve ever seen. There’s this “Baby Scan Jesus” ad on British billboards (left).

“This is not a cluster of cells but a human person and it just happens to be the God man Jesus…. That is a very, very powerful statement that will strike a chord with the general population,” said John Smeaton of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, according to the Guardian.

I’m no theologian, but I’m not sure it’s a great idea to try to convince pregnant women they shouldn’t get an abortion because they might be carrying the next Messiah. And the baby with the halo in utero? Who thought that up?

And it just gets weirder. Saw this ad posted at Shakesville today, which reads: “Dad says I’m the CEO of the House.”

What does that even mean? Is the house a metaphor for the mother’s uterus? Is Dad God? At any rate, it seems like some paternal figure is the one making the important decisions here, regardless of the mom’s perspective on all this.

Another WTF ad I found via Plunderbund:

Finally, there’s this series of Russian ads I saw on Copyranter and Shakesville:

The text reads (left to right): “I will make you happy. If I’m born.” – “I will amaze you. If I’m born.” - “I will help you. If I’m born.” Melissa McEwan at Shakesville jokes: “Well, no one ever told me I could have a MAGIC baby! This changes EVERYTHING.”

So what do you think? Which is the weirdest? I’m kinda torn between the Russian magic babies and Baby Scan Jesus. Any others you’ve seen that aren’t included here? I’d love to see them.

-Jarrah

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism, Politics 5 Comments

New Study Sheds Light on PTSD in Adults with Same-Gender Sex Partners

Welcome to our newest guest contributor, Roxanna Bennett. Roxanna is a third-wave feminist radical mama from Toronto, Ontario. She works as an artist educator and freelance writer. She has a lot of opinions that can be found here: http://marvelist.wordpress.com/.

A recent study (April 2010) from Harvard School of Public Health and Children’s Hospital Boston found that lesbians, bisexuals, gay men and heterosexuals who have ever had a same-gender sex partner are one and a half to two times more likely to have experienced violence in childhood and had double the risk of developing Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder as a result. 

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is an anxiety related psychological disorder affecting people who have experienced or witnessed traumatic events, such as torture, murder, rape, or wartime combat.  Symptoms can include recurrent flashbacks of the traumatic event, nightmares, irritability, anxiety, fatigue, forgetfulness, social withdrawal, hyper-vigilance, emotional numbing. The average lifetime risk for PTSD is four percent for men, ten percent for women. 

Among adults who have same-gender sex partners, the risk of PTSD is doubled to nine percent for men and twenty percent for women. The study found that 45 percent of lesbian women and 28 percent of gay men experienced violence or abuse in childhood while 21 percent of heterosexual (referred to as general population in the study) women and 20 percent of heterosexual men had experienced violence or abuse in childhood. 

Senior author Karestan Koenen said: “Our study documents that profound sexual orientation disparities exist in exposure to violence and other traumatic events beginning in childhood. Something about our society puts individuals with minority sexual orientations at high risk for victimization. This is a major public health problem that needs to be addressed.” 

It’s a relief to have this issue finally addressed in a major research study from a respected institution. Although most people assume that so-called sexual minorities are at higher risk for violence, having data and the outraged opinions of study authors should help to draw much needed attention, and hopefully funding, to this pervasive problem.

Not surprisingly, the data from a nationally representative sample of Americans showed researchers that heterosexuals who experience same-gender sexual attraction but have not had same-gender sex partners, were not at elevated risk for PTSD.

Researchers identified factors increasing the risk of violence exposure and PTSD development in adults with same-gender sex partners (referred to in the study as sexual minorities):

  • Nearly one-third of sexual minority adults in the U.S. report being victims of a hate crime
  • Gender socialization in childhood, increasing risk of being bullied
  • Discrimination and social isolation due to sexual orientation
  • Limited access to mental health care
  • Elevated risk-taking behavior rooted in social isolation and stigmatization

While all of this might appear as just plain common sense, this is the first research investigation to directly link higher rates of PTSD and greater risk of violence and trauma in adults with same-gender sex partners. Lead author Andrea Roberts said: “Medical professionals need to be aware that a high percentage of patients with minority sexual orientation may have been victims of interpersonal violence and may benefit from followup care to cope with the aftermath of violent victimization.”

-Roxanna

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in LGBT 1 Comment

Victoria Teen’s Tampon Project Makes School Uncomfortable

From today’s Times Colonist:

Kiera Porteous thought she had a terrific idea for her Social Justice 12 assignment.

The 17-year-old student at Saanich’s Spectrum Community School was supposed to come up with a plan to tackle some form of societal inequity.

Her proposal: A food drive-style tampon collection for women who can’t afford them…

“I thought it would be a great awareness campaign,” Porteous says of her project, in which members of the school community are being asked to donate feminine hygiene products for the Mustard Seed Food Bank.

Yes, she knew the subject matter would make some people uncomfortable, which meant she would have to be careful in how she got her message out. “I knew there would be restrictions,” she says. “I was hoping if I approached it properly, it wouldn’t be such a big deal.”

School authorities approved a poster soliciting donations, but restricted it to the girls’ washroom. On Monday, Porteous was dismayed when word of her campaign was excluded from the morning announcements over the public address system. Instead, the notice was included on the school’s website, where relatively few students go for information.

The muted approach made her feel that her positive campaign had been turned negative. “Unfortunately, there’s a taboo with this kind of thing.”

Check out the rest of the article for the Principal’s take (good project but need to protect students’ boundaries) as well as Kiera’s plan to look for community support where school support has been lacking. This one got me all riled up. It’s ridiculous that a school would encourage Social Justice students to create a project, but then not support projects that might make some people uncomfortable. We’re not even talking about drugs or sex or violence: we’re talking about tampons – something most girls in that school probably use. It’s crazy that we’re in a society that’s so period-phobic we can’t allow teenagers to think about the fact that women in poverty have periods.

But I’m glad the school is still collecting the tampons, so I will be picking up a couple boxes and mailing them over today. I’ll also be making a donation to Vancouver-based company Lunapads’ Pads4Girls program, which provides reusable pads for girls in developing nations so they can continue to attend school while on their periods.

-Jarrah

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism Leave a comment

FFFF: Girls Shouldn’t Have Ideas

Another installment of cartoon bears discussing abstinence-only education in this week’s Friday Feminist Funny Film:

 

Have a great weekend!

-Jarrah

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in FFFF, Politics Leave a comment

Bill C-510 Patronizes Women Seeking Abortions

Conservative MP Rod Bruinooge

It’s that time of the year again and no, I’m not talking about the holiday season. I’m talking about the time of year when a Conservative Member of Parliament puts forward a thinly-veiled Private Member’s Bill designed to make it harder for Canadian women to seek abortions. The latest is MP Rod Bruinooge’s Bill C-510, an act to prohibit “coerced abortion”. The bill is scheduled for second reading debate on December 13. For the record, this is the fourth time the Conservatives have tried this in as many years.

So what’s wrong with this bill? Of course, coercion is wrong and being pro-choice should mean that women should not only be able to choose abortion, but should also be able to choose to carry a fetus to term. The thing is, coercion is already illegal in Canada and counselors at abortion clinics are trained to screen clients for potential coercion.

Bruinooge and his bill’s endorsers, including the Catholic Civil Rights League, Ottawa Students 4 Life, Priests for Life Canada, and Lutherans for Life Canada, are trying to use the tragic murder of Roxanne Fernando to argue their case. The 24-year-old Fernando was brutally murdered by her boyfriend and an accomplice in Winnipeg in  2007. The bill’s supporters argue it’s because Ms. Fernando refused to have an abortion, but both the prosecution and the judge stated the motive for the murder was Fernando’s refusal to break off a relationship with her boyfriend. In his decision, the judge wrote: “The murder was apparently motivated by [the defendant's] irritation and panic that Ms. Fernando, who was carrying his baby, was insistent on having a relationship with him.”  While Fernando’s murder is abhorrent, what is even worse is Bruinooge’s using it to claim to be on the side of women while his own government continues to cut funding to programs geared towards ending violence against women.

So if coercion is already illegal, what does this legislation really accomplish? It would certainly do nothing to reduce violence against women. What this bill does is futher an atmosphere of intimidation against abortion providers, many of whom live with regular harassment from anti-abortion protesters and lobby groups. It also patronizes women by implying that many would not make a choice to have an abortion were they not subject to coercion. The Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada notes that coercing women is wrong, but argues that it’s much more frequent for women to be subject to coercive pressure not to have an abortion.

But perhaps most importantly, Bill C-510 defines abortion as causing the death of a “child”, attempting to open the back door for further criminalization of abortion. As NDP Health Critic Megan Leslie told the Toronto Star: “If we can open that door even a crack to this idea of fetal rights — which in my opinion promotes anti-choice ideas — that has an impact on women’s rights and freedoms when it comes to the very personal decision about abortion.”

You can read the debate from November 1st here and now’s the time to line up opposition to make sure this bill goes the way of the 3 before it. In my experience it’s more effective to take time to communicate with your Member of Parliament in your own words, but if you’re short on time, ARCC has a good draft letter for sending to MPs here.

-Jarrah

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism, Politics 8 Comments

The Round-Up: Dec. 8, 2010

-Jarrah

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Round-Ups Leave a comment

Feminist Men’s Slam Poetry

Feeling in a Wednesday slump? Here’s a couple videos of slam poetry by awesome feminist men to get you re-energized. Warning some language NSFW:

-Jarrah

Posted on by jarrahpenguin in Feminism, Pop Culture Leave a comment